Hamilton County Judges free essay sample

Three major court systems in Hamilton County were reviewed in depth, and case information from the Common Pleas, Domestic Relations, and Municipal Courts were reviewed. This study compiles information from 38 Judges who had a total of 182,908 cases presented to them over a three year period. This study shows the number of cases that were disposed, appealed, and reversed. This study is to aid in determining which judges have a greater proficiency trying cases and their verdicts stand as rendered, rather than the verdicts being appealed or reversed.Each judges case load was reviewed and the statistics were determined by how many cases have been appealed, reversed or a conjunction of both. This information will help determine the judges who have made the least, as well as the most errors, while serving in the Hamilton County Court System over the three year period. This study will show that for all the disposed cases in the Hamilton County Court System during the 3 year evaluation period, the Common Pleas Court the probability of a case being appealed and reversed is 0. We will write a custom essay sample on Hamilton County Judges or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page 1129 (11. 29%); Domestic Relations Courts probability of a case being appealed and reversed is 0. 604 (16. 04%); Municipal Court probability of a case being appealed and reversed is 0. 2080(20. 80%). In the Domestic Relations Court, evidence suggests that Ronald Panioto has the lowest probability of a case that he oversees being given an appeal and reversed, and Patrick Dinkelacker has the highest probability in a case that he oversees being given an appeal and reversed. In the Municipal Court, evidence suggests that Karla Grady and Deidre Hair have the lowest probability of a case that they oversee being given an appeal and reversed, and John A. West has the highest probability in a case that he oversees being given an appeal and reversed.The purpose of this study was to inform the newspaper of the amount of times mistakes occurred in this judicial system, and inform them of which judges were having a high rate of their cases appealed or overturned; in turn this indicated which judges were making too many mistakes, and which judges were doing a satisfactory job. A high rate or percentage of ruling reversals due to errors can be detrimental in the justice system, by releasing criminals on technicalities, who otherwise would be imprisoned. In these three court systems alone, out of 182,908 cases, 2,368 were appealed and 320 of those cases resulted in reverse decisions.